[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
Re: An interesting data point
On Mon, 4 Dec 2017, Kurt Seifried wrote:
: So from the current crop of CVE requests the DWF got:
:
: 7 BAD:DESCRIPTION
: 8 BAD:DESCRIPTION:MISSING:DETAILS
: 23 BAD:DESCRIPTION:MISSING:PRODUCT,BAD:DESCRIPTION:MISSING:VERSION
: 19 BAD:DESCRIPTION:MISSING:VERSION
: 1 BAD:MULTIPLE_ISSUES
: 11 BAD:REF_URL
: 1
BAD:REF_URL,BAD:DESCRIPTION:MISSING:VERSION,BAD:DESCRIPTION:MISSING:PRODUCT
: 2 BAD:VULN_TYPE
: 1 NEEDINFO
: 153 OK
:
: The status codes are at
:
https://github.com/distributedweaknessfiling/DWF-Documentation/blob/master/DWF-STATUS-ERROR-CODES-for-CVE-requests.md
: but should be pretty self evident. The good news is that a lot of
these
: can be fixed without to much work, but I definitely need to figure
out
: how to help people make better requests/write the descriptions (or
auto
: generate them.. I think that's the way to go).
Out of curiosity, since the information above doesn't let me figure it
out, what was the disposition code for CVE-2017-1000186? Curious if
that
was one of the non-OK entries.
Brian
