[ Date Prev ][ Date Next ][ Thread Prev ][ Thread Next ][ Date Index ][ Thread Index ]

Re: Current and future CVE states



Yes, Yes, and Yes....  vxref is what we should be using.

--
Kent Landfield
817-637-8026
kent_landfield@mcafee.com

On 5/3/17, 5:12 PM, "owner-cve-editorial-board-list@lists.mitre.org on
behalf of Art Manion" <owner-cve-editorial-board-list@lists.mitre.org
on behalf of amanion@cert.org> wrote:

    On 2017-05-03 15:36, Kurt Seifried wrote:

    > DUPLICATE_OF [CVE]
    >
    > SPLIT_TO [list of CVEs]
    >
    > MERGED_TO [lCVE]

    If we're going to get into relationships between vulnerabilities --
    which is related to, but possibly a bit beyond state -- I'd like to
    brief the board (or automation group) on vxref, which is a
structured
    relationship system.

    https://github.com/FIRSTdotorg/vrdx-sig-vxref-wip/tree/master/vxref


https://github.com/CERTCC-Vulnerability-Analysis/Vulnerability-Data-Archive-Tools

    Regards,

     - Art



Page Last Updated or Reviewed: May 04, 2017