[ Date Prev ][ Date Next ][ Thread Prev ][ Thread Next ][ Date Index ][ Thread Index ]

Re: CVE's for "smart" contracts, legal execution engines



On Mon, 20 Jun 2016, Kurt Seifried wrote:

: So the main issues that need to be dealt with:
:
: 1) Where do we draw the line on software/service for blockchain
: technologies?

Historically, the line has been drawn around the end-user software. So
a
vulnerability in the actual downloaded client qualifies for inclusion.
A
vulnerability in the 'math' behind the implementation is typically seen
as
a hybrid issue, or considered more a service offering. Issues in the
algorithm or implementation that can be abused via the client software
would fall under consumer software I believe, and warrant inclusion.


Page Last Updated or Reviewed: June 27, 2016