|
Looking at some CVE's and I'm seeing a lot of:
"affects": { "vendor": { "vendor_data": [ { "product": { "product_data": [ { "product_name": "n/a", "version": { "version_data": [ { "version_value": "n/a" } ] } } ] }, "vendor_name": "n/a" } ] } }, "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "n/a" } ] } ] }, shouldn't that have data instead of "n/a"? The description is clear: "value": "Icinga 2 v2.8.0 through v2.11.7 and v2.12.2 has an issue where revoked certificates due for renewal will automatically be renewed, ignoring the CRL. This issue is fixed in Icinga 2 v2.11.8 and v2.12.3." I get this for older data (e.g. pre 2016...) but for 2020: 25753 with actual product_name (with microsoft/Android/Apple dominating, good job) so 1/6 are "n/a", this seems like a lot of garbage data. Is this correct? -- |